Background and Purpose The different clinical subtypes of multiple sclerosis (MS) may reflect underlying variations in affected neuroanatomic regions. RRMS, SPMS, or PPMS by using a decision tree algorithm with the following input features: mind parenchymal fraction, age, disease duration, MOV, total corpus callosum area and areas of 5 segments of the corpus callosum. To test the robustness of the classification technique, we applied the results derived from the cross-sectional analysis to the longitudinal dataset. Results MOV and central corpus callosum section area were the 2 2 features retained by the decision tree. Individuals with MOV >0.94 cm3 were classified as having RRMS. Individuals with progressive MS were further subclassified as having SPMS if the central corpus callosum section area was <55.12 mm2, and as having PPMS otherwise. In the cross-sectional dataset, 51/64 (80%) individuals were correctly classified. For the longitudinal dataset, 88/114 (77%) patient time points were correctly classified as RRMS or SPMS. Conclusions Classification techniques revealed variations in affected neuroanatomic areas in subtypes of multiple sclerosis. The combination of central corpus callosum section area and MOV provides good discrimination among individuals with RRMS, SPMS, and PPMS. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is definitely a chronic multifactorial disease with a strong neurodegenerative component associated with progressive atrophy of the brain and spinal cord.1,2 The most frequent form of MS presents initially as relapsing-remitting (RR), followed subsequently by a secondary-progressive (SP) phase in approximately 50% of individuals.3 Time to conversion to SPMS varies significantly, having a reported mean of 10 years.3 In the early RR phase of the disease, an autoimmune inflammatory process Flurazepam 2HCl seems to be predominant,3-5 whereas in the SP phase, neurodegeneration becomes more obvious.3-5 Primary-progressive MS (PPMS) appears to be characterized by a prevalently neurodegenerative process Flurazepam 2HCl from your onset of disease, though this has been a topic of debate.6 MR imaging is the most important imaging technique for the analysis and monitoring of individuals with MS.7 MR imagingCbased cells volumetry such as T2 lesion volume and mind parenchymal fraction has been used to measure inflammatory and neurodegenerative aspects of MS. It has been reported the assessment of global atrophy is an appealing and powerful measure for the quantification of neurodegeneration.1,2,8 Although mind parenchymal fraction is a complex reflection of different degenerative aspects such as demyelination, axonal degeneration, and neuronal loss, it has been proposed that separate steps of gray matter and white matter atrophy might more specifically reflect the underlying histopathology and provide better correlates with functional deficits. Global gray matter volume, cortical thickness mapping, and actions of subcortical nuclei have all been used to assess the effect of MS on neuronal populations.9-11 Cross-sectional and volumetric actions of white colored matter Flurazepam 2HCl regions have more recently been complemented by more detailed and complex actions such as diffusion tensor imaging and magnetization transfer percentage. Recent work offers reported an association between subolivary medulla oblongata cross-sectional measurement and progressive MS, suggesting that such actions may be somewhat specific for the degree of axonal involvement in the degenerative process. 12 In this study, we evaluated the ability of cross-sectional actions from 2 white matter tracts associated with different practical systems, the medulla oblongata volume (MOV) and the area of the corpus callosum, to distinguish RRMS, SPMS, and PPMS. This approach also checks the hypothesis that the different medical subtypes of MS have underlying variations in affected neuroanatomic areas. Although both of these regions of interest target white matter tracts, they may be specific to different practical systems, namely the sensory-motor pathways (MOV) versus callosal interhemispheric association materials Flurazepam 2HCl (corpus callosum).13 Because current clinical meanings of SPMS are heavily reliant on engine overall performance, size assessment of white matter pathways in the Rabbit polyclonal to ZNF562 medulla oblongata may be a good candidate for any surrogate marker for this phase of disease. The corpus callosum, on the other hand, projects to a very large portion of the overall cerebral white matter, potentially providing a sensitive and methodologically simple reflection of total cerebral white matter damage. Our results display that classification techniques can be used to unveil variations in affected neuroanatomic areas in subtypes of MS. The combination of corpus callosum and MOV metrics differentiate well between medical MS phenotypes and might become useful as surrogate actions more directly linked to underlying neurodegenerative processes. Materials and Methods A total of 178 MR imaging examinations from 89 individuals were analyzed with this study. A Flurazepam 2HCl detailed description of the datasets used is definitely offered below. Patient Human population for Cross-Sectional Analysis The MR images of 64 individuals with MS from your Comprehensive Longitudinal Investigation of Multiple Sclerosis in the Brigham and Women’s.